So far in 2014 I
have seen three live productions of King Lear: one in Brooklyn, one in
Manhattan, and one broadcast live from London to Queens. My friend Horvendile has seen those plus one
more. The latest is the undercooked
production that had its first performance on a hot summer night at the
Delacorte. The weather was well
programmed, with hard, hot winds whipping through the tree tops around the
theatre in time with the light- and sound-designed storm at the end of the
first half and beginning of the second.
This King
Lear is the production of the New York Shakespeare Festival directed by
Daniel Sullivan. However, the first night’s performance showed
little evidence of direction after the opening scene.
John Lee Beatty’s scenic design (an elevated square with raw
wooden steps, a textured back wall, all in tan) in combination with the magical
lighting design by Jeff Croiter and video design by Tal Yarden, was
absolutely splendid, imaginative, vital, and exciting. Costumes designed by Susan Hilferty were lived in, earth toned, suited to characters and
their times. Unfortunately the play did
not play as well together as did its design elements.
Did I mention that
the play was over three hours long? And that every minute was felt? The
production needs at least another week of rehearsal — and some cutting.
I am not tired of King Lear. As I wrote earlier this year about a bunch of
Lears (http://www.mollyismusing.blogspot.com/2014_05_01_archive.html),
each combination of actors and director and space brings a different dynamic to
the familiar scenes. For all those
chemical reactions to work together to create theatrical magic requires tight
oversight by a director with a vision.
It would have seemed that, if Mr. Sullivan had a vision, he did not
share it with his actors, but John Lithgow’s ill-advised blog about the
production belies that notion. Nevertheless,
performances were uneven and timing was awry. The interesting choices made by Jessica Hecht as Regan worked solo but not in conjunction with her
fellows. The rich voice of Clarke Peters as Gloucester did not
vary in tempo or texture; perhaps he did not know his lines well enough to
live, rather than recite, them. And Annette Bening, whose early
professional experience was stage work, forgot how to live in her body onstage —
she backed up, she shilly shallied, she never stopped moving and tossing her
arms about as if she were drowning. Seemingly
uncertain of her lines, she came off as insecure and leaning toward panic. She
had not found Goneril.
The most certain,
solid, real performance came from Jay O.
Sanders as Kent. He and John Lithgow at least appeared to be in
the same play, although Mr. Lithgow’s Lear has not dropped from his head to his
gut — that is, he’s still thinking instead of being.
Steven Boyer as the Fool, John Lithgow as King Lear, Jay O. Sanders as Kent. Photo Credit Sara Krulwich, NYT 2014 |
Edmund is well played by Eric
Sheffer Stevens, recently seen as Borachio in last month’s Much
Ado About Nothing at the same theatre [http://www.mollyismusing.blogspot.com/2014/06/much-ado-about-summer-shakespeare.html]. Mr. Stevens may need a little aging, like
cheese and wine, but he has great potential.
He has facility with language, he has timing and presence. Notably, his attention to the world around
him is vital in live theatre, especially when a particular movie star kept
getting too close to Rick Sordelet’s
well-staged final duel between Edmund and Edgar.
Speaking of Edgar, apparently he’s the star of this production. Chukwudi
Iwuji takes his own sweet time playing Poor Tom as totally sane, stopping
the story cold as the characters on stage with him must hold until he stops
talking, which he does clearly, succinctly, and slowly. Someone should tell Mr. Iwuji that the play
is called King Lear, not Poor Tom.
As for the Dukes (husbands of the two elder sisters), I was spoiled by the
TFANA production which provided the most marvelous, wicked, and creepy Cornwall
and Regan I have ever seen. Both Goneril’s husband Albany (Christopher Innvar) and Regan’s husband Cornwall (Glenn Fleshler) were solid if
unimaginative.
What about Cordelia, you ask. Jessica Collins’ speech and voice are
clear. She cries; we do not.
Steven Boyer as Lear’s Fool
was too young and did not overcome this obstacle by creating a believable
relationship with his King no matter how hard John Lithgow tried. Mr. Boyer enunciates well. The Fool’s death was done onstage so no one
would wonder what happened to him. This
is called dotting I’s and crossing T’s without writing whole words to contain
them. Mr. Sullivan’s vision has
disconcerting gaps.
All in all, a disappointing (and long) evening. It may well be that all this production’s
disparate characters and actors will gel in a few weeks. Some judicious cutting
of the script (which should have been done a month ago) could help it all come
together.
For those of
you who may think I’m being harsh, I have seen the first performance of a play
at the Delacorte in the past. One lovely
summer evening, a cast and crew came together and, for the first time, put
together all the technical and creative elements, right there in front of the
first night’s audience. It went
extremely well. The first performance
before an audience should be ready for an audience, even if that audience paid
with its time not its money. Daniel Sullivan’s production of King Lear should have been much better
prepared for its first night than it was.
~
Molly Matera, signing off to dream of perfect combinations of Lears and
Gonerils and Regans and even Cordelias, coming in at under three hours.